CAIR "panty-in-a-Wad" Whine-O-Gram Drive-By, Christmas Eve Edition

Merry Christmas my fellow bloggers, I hope this post finds you all full of the spirit that is this season. Now I haven’t much time but I’ve oodles to report and the unindicted terror coconspirators are consulting the Kama sutra in order to exit these situations on top, so to speak.

So without further ado following that huge build up, I give you the Christmas Eve whine-o-gram edition;

From the now frozen tundra formerly know as Detroit, a Walmart employee is fired and CAIR comes to the rescue alleging religious bias. Chalk one up for their year end discrimination tally.

This next item comes to us from Georgia. I'm sure you all heard a big fracas was made when a woman was barred from entering a courtroom wearing her headscarf. What CAIR isn’t telling us here is the woman was not arrested because she refused to remove her headgear, she was arrested because she SWORE at the bailiff (but you have to click to the second page of the Guardian to get to that part of the story). I wonder if that’s halal??? Anywho, CAIR asked the DoJ to probe the incident looking for possible civil rights violations.

Then there’s this little gem to which CAIR claims to need clarification. Lawrence Kulak of 5 Towns Jewish Times wrote an opinion piece, no longer online but you can view it on pages 59-61 here, and writes a “clarification” in defense of his article.

I hope these tidbits keep you entertained over the next few days if you DO find time to surf the blogosphere. I wish you all a Merry and safe Christmas, enjoy.

The Case Against CAIR

A few weeks ago I told you about the scrumptious legal dish served up at the annual CAIR banquet. As Congressman Larry Shaw (D-NC) was addressing the faithful, Dave Gaubatz walked to the stage and served CAIR’s national director Nihad Awad with a subpoena.

A tip of my hat to my blogging twin, Dinah Lord, for sending me the link with a continuation of the story.

On Wednesday Front Page Magazine published an interview, titled “The Last Days of CAIR”, with attorney David Yerushalmi.

Four of his plaintiffs were once clients of CAIR, says Yerushalmi, and have filed a federal civil complaint alleging criminal fraud and racketeering against CAIR. Once you read the interview and review the pending charges it becomes clear how this could be the end of CAIR. And if the MSM picks this up and runs with it, CAIR will be finished in the court of public opinion as well.

Yerushalmi is a litigator specializing in securities law, public policy relating to national security, and public interest law. And it’s from this perspective we learn that CAIR’s demise may be on the horizon. Here’s a few interesting snippets from the interview;

What many people don’t realize is that CAIR operates and presents itself as a public interest law firm, much like the ACLU. As a PILF, it must comply with the codes of professional responsibility applicable to lawyers in the jurisdictions in which it operates and keep sacred the fiduciary duty it owes its clients. As the complaint sets out in careful detail, CAIR trampled on its clients and disregarded its professional obligations with a callous and calculating malice.

The named defendants are: the Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network Inc. (dba CAIR); Nihad Awad aka Nihad Hammad who serves as executive director of CAIR National; Parvez Ahmed who was the chairman of the board of CAIR National during the relevant time period; Tahra Goraya who was the national director of CAIR but who has since resigned; Khadijah Athman who is the manager of the “civil rights” division of CAIR; and Nadhira al-Khalili, Esq., who is in-house legal counsel for CAIR.

Also named as defendants are Ibrahim Hooper and Amina Rubin, CAIR’s director of communications and coordinator of communications, respectively. According to the complaint, these two were directly responsible for issuing fraudulent press releases about the Days fraud scheme, thus aiding and abetting the CAIR cover-up.

When reading through the interview, one sees how the islamic spider web interconnects various terror networks and nefarious charities to this soon-to-be-defunct muslim civil rights group. It's a great dialogue and I look forward to their day in court.

Things that make you go hummm....

Eureka!

Your humble blogger, and I can safely say my blogging twin, Dinah Lord think this may be the root of all the sexual weirdness going on in the ummah.

Is it me, or do these guys look a tad embarrassed, by this “religious” experience?

Strangely enough, this odd looking, umm, hole in that black meteorite is named Hajar….. Sounds like Hagar, the mother of Ishmael. I’m just sayin’ is all.

You can all come to your own conclusions regarding the symbolism of this thing named Hajar. I’m extremely interested in how Chris Malott will opine.

Drive-By Whine-O-Gram

Today’s post will be a drive-by whine-o-gram special. Concern arose, in the comments section of my last post, due to my absence and I was reminded by the newly created OBT position holder that it’s been a week since I opined on the unindicted terror coconspirator, CAIR.

So here we go;

Can you guess which congressman made the trek around the black meteorite, and risk being trampled to death, in Saudi Arabia? If you said Keith Ellison you’d be correct! And CAIR’s Hopper weighs in on this positive and inclusive message this sends the world. You've gotta read the comments from the website, I love it!

“The Purpose of Life? 877-WHY-ISLAM” This billboard was brought to the sunshine state travelers by the same “advocacy” group that has ties to many terrorist organizations, ICNA, islamic circle of North America. Again, you have to read the comments from readers.

The end of 2008 is almost upon us and CAIR’s NY chapter is teaming up with the Sikh Coalition asking NYC public school pupils and their parents to fill out an online questionnaire. Pertaining to what you ask? Well racial bullying of course. We’re a tolerant bunch, us Americans, and the ummah needs every little incident they can get to guilt this nation into submission.

And finally, because we all know Ishmael was saved by a goat provided to Abraham by allah, I give you these two stories, here and here, of charity during the muslim holiday of being trampled to death by your coreligionists eid-al adha.
I don’t know about you guys, but I know I’ll never be hungry enough to eat the meat of a goat or a lamb that had its throat slit and then bled to death in an urban alleyway.
Never, ever…… how ‘bout you?
And reading the comments from readers is a must on both of these articles.

Whine-O-Gram speed link

Yesterday’s whine-o-gram had so many items of interest I had to do a “drive-by” speed link. Here we go;

First we have letters to the editor responding to Cal Thomas’ op-ed. This is all I’m going to say about these two articles; “Joseph Goebbels” and “The Planet of the Apes”.

Next up we have the case of an ex-marine (who’s son was murdered on the USS Cole) suing for the right to display “offensive” stickers on his car. CAIR’s Ibrahim Hooper says the marine has a right to be “an anti-muslim bigot”.

And rounding out this edition of whine-o-gram speed linking, we have CAIR suggesting an alternative December greeting to counter Bill O’Reilly’s Merry Christmas. It's the all inclusive “eid mubarak” for this holiday season.

CAIR; Action Alert & Incitement Watch

The Simpsons and FOX are the subject of Action Alert #554. CAIR asked the RoP faithful to “Send a message expressing appreciation for highlighting both anti-Muslim attitudes and the need for mutual respect and inclusion in our society.” If a cartoon can cause muslims to commit world-wide chaos, Bart Simpson can hold the key to winning to the war on islamic terror. Maybe Obama will appoint the character to be our next middle east envoy.


Once again Cal Thomas draws the ire of CAIR and joins a long list of “incitement watch” recipients. Thomas’ syndicated article, “Radical Muslims’ goal is total domination”, caused the unindicted terror co-conspirators to agitate alert the ummah.

Here’s the polarizing paragraph, highlighted by Dallas Morning News' Jeffrey Weiss, from Thomas' op-ed; "At the very least, all non-Western immigrants to Britain and America should be told prior to their arrival that our intention is to westernize them. They must learn English, study and embrace the history of their host nation and, if they are Muslim, they will be allowed to worship only in existing mosques. No new ones should be built. Existing mosques must be monitored to make sure that hate is not taught and aggressive behavior toward their host countries is not promoted. If such behavior and speech are detected, the mosques should be closed and the imams arrested or deported."

I don't see what's so offensive.

What I do see is the exclusion of the reasons for such extreme national security measures. Islamic doctrine sees the world in two compartments. Simply put the house of islam (dar al-islam) and the house of war (dar al-harb). Either islam is dominant in the land (nation/country) or they’re at war to become dominant in the land.

In 1998 CAIR’s Omar Ahmad stated their obligation as muslims in dar al-harb; urging fellow RoP faithful “not to shirk their duty of sharing the islamic faith with those on the wrong side”. This priceless gem, “islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith but to become dominant”. And turning America into dar al-islam “The koran should be the highest authority in America and islam the only accepted religion on earth” and much, much more. From the beginning CAIR and the larger islamic community have not gone out of their way to hide their intentions.

Although Thomas does not mention them by name, it’s quite clear as he explains the ideology this way; “Radical Muslim doctrine considers all land potential, or actual, "Muslim land." There’s no rebuttal to this point and I doubt the ummah finds this offensive.

What can CAIR do?

One of today’s whine-o-gram news headings announced "US MUSLIMS WORRY ABOUT NEW FEDERAL RULES”.

In the wake of the islamo-terror attacks in India, where death cult faithful tortured and then murdered close to 200 people, muslims in America are concerning themselves with the new Justice Department guidelines. The ummah in America is worried the FBI will “profile” and “target” muslims unjustly.

Are you kidding me?!?!?

Those entrusted to safeguard the American citizenry need to profile and target the islamic communities. We know who to look for, we have detailed descriptions of those who want to do us harm and inflict maximum carnage on the infidels, all in the name of allah. The perpetrators are born, raised and funded in the islamic community.

Why are we walking on eggshells when it comes to muslims? Why do we capitulate to islamic “cultural sensitivity” on issues of national security? Why is CAIR forcing area police, the military and every other law enforcement branch in America to attend diversity training?

And if the ummah was serious about their “Not in our name” campaign and the “fatwa against terrorism” then they would be on the front lines of this fight. But they’re not. Gathering signatures on a petition or constructing a religious ruling condemning “terror” is just words, and not very convincing ones at that.

I want them to condemn terrorists by name! I want them to police their own and hand over radicals within their mosques, neighborhoods and families! I want them to lead the fight against the cancer that's tainting the entire body!

Debbie Schlussel has a great piece regarding CAIR’s response to the Mumbai massacre. Well worth the read.

SunRise Equities scam

As I perused my favorite blogs this morning, Skye Puppy posted some words of wisdom on our economy from AQ number 2, Ayman al-Zawahri. Skye linked to an old islamic banking post of mine from March 2008. The post gave an overview of SunRise Equities, based in Chicago, one of many sharia compliant financial institutions to pop-up in the United States.

Today, SunRise Equities and is no longer doing business. Why? Well it seems the sin of greed isn’t limited to Christians and Jews, muslims fall victim as well. In August of this year the pious muslim businessman Salman Ibrahim disappeared with upwards of 50 million dollars belonging to 200 north Chicago investors.

(As a side note, since this came to light during the holy month of terror ramadan, do you think he’ll receive extra raisins?)

However, in researching articles for this post, I came across a very interesting post that is fraught with conspiracy, murder and politics. Rehan Sheikh, a Chicago cabbie and part-time radio host, knew too much about SunRise and paid the price. But, before he died he talked, a lot. On a site dedicated to the SunRise victims, Grammar Gal conveys what he was told by the now deceased Rehan Sheikh. Links to president elect Obama, a radical imam Nawal-ur Rehman (who was also president of the Shariah Board of America) and Tablighi Jama'at (part of the same organization I posted about here and here a.k.a Islamberg).

In short, Gal believes his source (Rehan Sheikh) was murdered for what he knew. This story would make a great suspense novel or movie of the week, if only it wasn’t true.

Subpoenas Served at CAIR Banquet!

Imagine my surprise when I opened my email and see CAIR officials were served with subpoenas. Last night during the annual banquet, CAIR national director Nihad Awad was served a summons to appear in court.

Dave Gaubatz head of the “Mapping Sharia Project” personally served Nihad Awad with his subpoena. The dramatic moment caught on tape as Congressman Larry Shaw (NC-D) was addressing the crowd in Arlington VA.

Four CAIR clients have filed a federal civil complaint alleging criminal fraud and racketeering against CAIR, a self-described public interest civil rights law firm. The lawsuit also names CAIR's national leadership as individual defendants.

The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, alleges that Morris Days, the "resident attorney" and "manager for civil rights" at the now defunct CAIR MD/VA chapter in Herndon, Va., was in fact not an attorney and that he failed to provide legal services for clients who came to CAIR for assistance and who had paid for CAIR legal services.

The suit charges CAIR officials purposefully concealed the truth about Days from their clients, law enforcement, the Virginia and D.C. state bar associations and the media. When CAIR got irate calls from clients about Days' failure to provide competent legal services, CAIR is charged with fraudulently deceiving clients about Days' relationship to CAIR, concealing the fact that CAIR had fired him for criminal fraud.

Now I must add in the interest of full disclosure, a couple months ago Dinah Lord forwarded an email to me regarding donations made to CAIR. Later I was contacted by Andrew Whitehead of Anti-CAIR asking if I had donated to CAIR, either money or time, between a specific time period earlier this year. I replied that I had “donated” to CAIR in an attempt to receive a “free” koran along with the date and the donation amount. A few days later I was asked if my information could be forwarded and used, to which I had no objection.

I'm sure CAIR HQ is buzzing this morning, the spin doctors are in overdrive and 'real' lawyers are trying to turn this to their advantage. I'll post the whine-o-gram response when it's sent.

CAIR quiet on al Zarahri quote

Yesterday Dinah Lord remarked on the lack of response from CAIR regarding Ayman al-Zawahri labeling president-elect Obama a “house negro”. And after I did a bit of searching I found that this idiom is very common for muslims. Once again Debbie Schlussel has the 411 on how the American ummah feel about using the word.

So back to the CAIR response. In all honesty I was waiting for the standard terrorist distancing whine-o-gram, seeing how the ummah overwhelmingly supported Obama. So imagine my surprise when the email announced “CAIR: Zawahri Does Not Speak for Muslims” and the only rebuff was a tired old link to the CAIR anti-terrorism page.

The Associated Press article link didn't even have a CAIR official quote. Then again, what could they say? How could they rebuff the good Egyptian doctor? He is after all a muslim brotherhood member in good standing.

Upon reading the translation, I was pleased to read most of the drivel was a recruitment tool for al qaida wannabes. The number 2 terrorist went on to discount the Obama victory saying; “America has put on a new face, but its heart full of hate, mind drowning in greed, and spirit which spreads evil, murder, repression and despotism continue to be the same as always,".

Continuing on Ayman said the Obama plan to beef up troop levels in the Afghan theater would result in failure and the “dogs of Afghanistan have found the flesh of your soldiers to be delicious, so send thousands after thousands to them”.

Regarding the Obama photo-op at the Wailing/Western Wall during his world tour and his professed support for the State of Israel, the good doctor opined that "confirmed to the Ummah (Islamic world) that you have chosen a stance of hostility to Islam and Muslims".

Now, it is my opinion that these three points are closely held by CAIR officials and the American ummah. The anti-war, anti-Israel and anti-American capitalistic way of governance is deemed contemptuous for many in the islamic community in America.

Perhaps that’s why CAIR attached that sorry anti-terrorism link without an original assertion denouncing the terrorist statement. You know, just for show, kind of an inside joke. We’re making an attempt to distance ourselves, but not really.